<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tiger Woods Headlines Our Gutsiest All-Time Performances in Sports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theangryt.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theangryt.com/?p=632</link>
	<description>Sports Roasts...Served Rare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:30:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SOG knives</title>
		<link>http://theangryt.com/?p=632&#038;cpage=1#comment-10307</link>
		<dc:creator>SOG knives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryt.com/?p=632#comment-10307</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SOG knives...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting ideas... I wonder how the Hollywood media would portray this?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SOG knives&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting ideas&#8230; I wonder how the Hollywood media would portray this?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://theangryt.com/?p=632&#038;cpage=1#comment-4591</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theangryt.com/?p=632#comment-4591</guid>
		<description>I read similar article also named Tiger Woods Headlines Our Gutsiest All-Time Performances in Sports, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read similar article also named Tiger Woods Headlines Our Gutsiest All-Time Performances in Sports, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
