Dec
10
2008

Really PETA? In the Future, if the Other Kardashian Sister Wants to Be Nude in One of Your Ads. JUST SAY NO!

Written by aeneas07 | Visited 527 times, 4 so far today

Listen, I don’t want animals to be harmed in any way either…unless they can make me warmer, less hungry, or more satisfied sexually.

This whole, nude for PETA thing started off so promising. Look at Tamara Ecclestone, this is the type of chick that everyone, from the NRA member to the vegan, can get on board with. But honestly PETA, I don’t think animals would even want to be protected if the only way to get it done was for this chick to pose nude:

PETA shots after the jump.

http://www.celebritywonder.com/picture/Khloe_Kardashian/KhloeKardash_Grant_13336363.jpg

Whoever put this photo together should get a Nobel Prize for photoshopping a whole lot of ugly off this skank.  They should have just photoshopped that her sister’s famous ass right over her face.

Listen PETA, this Khloe chick might look a lot more like the average PETA member than Tamara Ecclestone, but you have to remember that you are trying to convince meat eating non-PETA members to change their ways.  So stick to your original plan, throw the hot chicks out there front and center and maybe, just maybe, somebody out there will put down the burger in favor of a salad.  Unfortunately, that salad will probably be a taco salad. And now I know what I’m eating for lunch, thanks PETA.

The Angry T

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Popularity: 1% [?]

5 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL


Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. Theme: TheBuckmaker. PHP Resources, Eigenbau